- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:31:54 +0100
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2013-02-18, at 17:58 +0100, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote: > On 2/18/2013 8:48 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > >Looks like interesting reading: > >http://www.ivir.nl/news/European_Copyright_Society_Opinion_on_Svensson.pdf > > I'd be grateful if someone with legal qualifications could confirm, but my impression is that this is a strong endorsement of the proposition that linking typically cannot constitute copyright infringement. > > If I understand correctly, this ruling does suggest that there may be limited situations relating to (from item 7 in the "General" section): Just briefly: This isn't a "ruling", but a statement put out by a large number of legal scholars who are trying to influence the European Court of Justice in its ruling on a pending case. > (a) Accessory liability (particularly in respect of knowingly facilitating the making of illegal copies);6 > (b) Unfair competition; > (c) Infringement of moral rights; > (d) Circumvention of technological measures. > > > in which linking might after all possibly constitute or contribute to infringement. Do I have that right? If so, seems like a very sensible ruling to me. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 10:32:07 UTC