- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:58:26 -0500
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- CC: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, djweitzner@w3.org
On 2/18/2013 8:48 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote: >Looks like interesting reading: >http://www.ivir.nl/news/European_Copyright_Society_Opinion_on_Svensson.pdf I'd be grateful if someone with legal qualifications could confirm, but my impression is that this is a strong endorsement of the proposition that linking typically cannot constitute copyright infringement. If I understand correctly, this ruling does suggest that there may be limited situations relating to (from item 7 in the "General" section): (a) Accessory liability (particularly in respect of knowingly facilitating the making of illegal copies);6 (b) Unfair competition; (c) Infringement of moral rights; (d) Circumvention of technological measures. in which linking might after all possibly constitute or contribute to infringement. Do I have that right? If so, seems like a very sensible ruling to me. Thank you. Noah
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 16:58:56 UTC