- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 14:52:51 -0400
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4FC27803.8020704@arcanedomain.com>
Jeni: I'm working on the F2F agenda. From the as yet unpublished IRC log of the 24 May telcon (see especially the highlighted lines): --------------------------------------------------------------------------- <noah> ACTION-690?* <trackbot> ACTION-690 -- Jeni Tennison to sort next steps on Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types -- due 2012-05-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW *<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/690 <noah> ACTION-672?* <trackbot> ACTION-672 -- Jeni Tennison to work with PLH to create W3C-sponsored registry of HTML extensions, and get that referenced from HTML media type registration, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Jan/0048.html -- due 2012-05-29 -- OPEN* <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/672 <noah> I thought the ball was in my court to mark the product page approved jt: Re fragids and mime types, I did a product page, needs to be revised per comments nm: I thought we had approved the product page & that NMM was supposed to do clerical work. Happy with product page <noah> Jeni will mark product page as "not draft".* <noah> close ACTION-690** <trackbot> ACTION-690 sort next steps on Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types closed** jt: I've done an initial draft that's currently with Larry. /_I can take an action to provide it for F2F_/*_/* */_lm: I'll try to get back to you [JT] by this weekend, otherwise just go ahead and publish nm: On the master work plan page we sometimes pull out 1-2 next steps, pls check that* jt: Re action 672, let's talk about that when it's done* --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes/questions: * I will put Fragids and Mime types on the agenda, with a placeholder for a new draft as required reading. If you have any other "framing" material you'd like in the agenda text, please let me know. * Should we have opened a successor action to 690, per the underlined note above? * Do you expect to want discussion of action-672 at the F2F? Many thanks! Noah
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2012 18:53:24 UTC