- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 14:52:51 -0400
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4FC27803.8020704@arcanedomain.com>
Jeni:
I'm working on the F2F agenda. From the as yet unpublished IRC log of the
24 May telcon (see especially the highlighted lines):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<noah> ACTION-690?*
<trackbot> ACTION-690 -- Jeni Tennison to sort next steps on
Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types -- due 2012-05-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW
*<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/690
<noah> ACTION-672?*
<trackbot> ACTION-672 -- Jeni Tennison to work with PLH to create
W3C-sponsored registry of HTML extensions, and get that referenced
from HTML media type registration, per
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Jan/0048.html --
due 2012-05-29 -- OPEN*
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/672
<noah> I thought the ball was in my court to mark the product page
approved
jt: Re fragids and mime types, I did a product page, needs to be
revised per comments
nm: I thought we had approved the product page & that NMM was
supposed to do clerical work. Happy with product page
<noah> Jeni will mark product page as "not draft".*
<noah> close ACTION-690**
<trackbot> ACTION-690 sort next steps on Fragment Identifiers and
Mime Types closed**
jt: I've done an initial draft that's currently with Larry. /_I can
take an action to provide it for F2F_/*_/*
*/_lm: I'll try to get back to you [JT] by this weekend, otherwise
just go ahead and publish
nm: On the master work plan page we sometimes pull out 1-2 next
steps, pls check that*
jt: Re action 672, let's talk about that when it's done*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes/questions:
* I will put Fragids and Mime types on the agenda, with a placeholder for
a new draft as required reading. If you have any other "framing"
material you'd like in the agenda text, please let me know.
* Should we have opened a successor action to 690, per the underlined
note above?
* Do you expect to want discussion of action-672 at the F2F?
Many thanks!
Noah
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2012 18:53:24 UTC