- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 20:19:43 +0100
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Amy van der Hiel <amy@w3.org>
Noah, I've just set ACTION-690 as Pending Review, as it is ready for discussion, but as I won't be there on Thursday I'd suggest this week wouldn't be a good time to discuss it. Thanks, Jeni On 8 May 2012, at 20:00, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > As promised, I've been going through the usual process of pulling together an agenda for Thursday, in spite of the likelihood that I will not be able to chair. > > Unfortunately, I don't yet see much that merits a call. So, this e-mail is to summarize what I have found, and to solicit your concurrence that the call should be cancelled (or else your suggestions for topics to discuss after all). > > Specifically, the pending review actions are [1] > > ------- > * ACTION-677: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about timing for output of Encrypted Media TF - Due: 2012-04-24 - PENDING REVIEW [2] > > ...as noted in the comments for the action, we received a response, and it's not clear that followup is needed. > > * ACTION-697: on - Larry Masinter - prepare overview of DANE for TAG consideration - Due: 2012-05-16 - PENDING REVIEW [3] > > ...we discussed that last week [4], and the next step is for Larry to invite a couple of guests to discuss this with us on a call (I'm thinking maybe the action should be re-opened, or maybe closed and replaced by another?) > > * ACTION-703: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Put health warning in "Booth Script" for formatting minutes - Due: 2012-05-10 - PENDING REVIEW > > I've posted a script at [6], and the general reaction seems to have been at least moderately favorable. I suggest we just close the action. > ------- > > I also went through last week's minutes (which were particularly clear and helpful...thank you Jeni!), and didn't see anything there that needed to be continued this week. The one other thing I did see was Jeni's posting [7] of a new proposed "product page" for work on fragment ids in the context of [8]: > > ACTION-690: on - Jeni Tennison - sort next steps on Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types - Due: 2012-05-05 - OPEN > > ...but that's not marked PENDING, so may not be ready for discussion. > > The one other thing that is important is to start thinking about preparation for the June F2F. To make sure everyone notices, I'll send a separate not on that shortly. > > SO: does anyone have a topic that would merit discussion? If not, I will officially cancel the telcon, before I "disappear" later this evening. Thank you. > > Noah > > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/677 > [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/697 > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/05/03-minutes#item03 > [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/703 > [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/05/03-minutes > [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012May/0020.html > [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/690 > > -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:20:17 UTC