- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:46:26 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
I've just been reviewing the draft Media Fragments specification [1] and I note that it says of the Web: "A further requirement put on a URI fragment is that the media type of the retrieved fragment should be the same as the media type of the primary resource. Among other things, this means that a URI fragment that points to a single video frame out of a longer video results in a one-frame video, not in a still image. To extract a still image, one would need to create a URI query scheme - something not envisaged here, but easy to devise." I don't >think< I've seen anything in pertinent RFCs or in the Web Arch documents that mandates that conclusion. E.g. we use fragments to identify elements within an XML document; is an element a smaller XML document? I don't think so. What am I missing? Is this a misunderstanding that the TAG should correct? Thank you. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-media-frags-20120315/
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 15:46:52 UTC