- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:41:31 +0900
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, www-tag@w3.org
On 2012/06/23 20:51, Julian Reschke wrote: > For the record: it's a URI reference (as per > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#uri-reference>), so you > *could* make the parameter a URI reference. Also just for the record: Syntactically, yes. But what would be the base URI to resolve it to? You can't get from "joe@gmail.com" to "https://gmail.com/.well-known/host-meta?resource=joe@gmail.com" by resolution of a relative URI. Anyway, as Larry said a few hours ago, what's much more important is that people who are interested in criteria for new URI/IRI schemes contribute to the update of RFC 4395 in the IETF IRI WG. Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 06:42:16 UTC