- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:53:07 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FE60283.4030002@openlinksw.com>
On 6/23/12 8:32 AM, Nathan wrote: > Michiel de Jong wrote: >> Hi Nathan, >> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >>> Each service I can think of, has a stable (non-URI) identifier for user >>> accounts, from google through twitter, IMO those should be used, not >>> these >>> fragile email addresses with a new scheme bolted on the front to try >>> and >>> make it identify something it doesn't. >> >> It's a premise of webfinger that we resolve a human-memorable string >> of the form 'user@host' to accounts. > > I understand that, but don't see any need for a acct: URI scheme to > accomplish that. > > This is a URI that will accomplish the task: > > https://gmail.com/.well-known/host-meta?resource=joe@gmail.com > > So where's the need for acct: ? That's a resource identifier, not a generic name. Please understand that when all is said and done, given its costs, acct: + webfinger is just another approach to Linked Data. You can't invalidate options. Simply don't adopt them. > > This is not two URIs, it's one URI, and no better than the above in > any way: > > https://gmail.com/.well-known/host-meta?resource=acct:joe@gmail.com URI: acct:joe@gmail.com -- denotes a real-world entity (style: human oriented natural key) URL: https://gmail.com/.well-known/host-meta?resource=acct:joe@gmail.com -- identifies a resource. Linked Data: A user agent would de-reference <acct:joe@gmail.com> by implementing the Webfinger protocol. Some user agents would allow you to register this URI scheme and set its resolution mechanism. > > Thus, I conclude that the only reason to have acct: and to strap it to > joe@gmail.com is to use it as an identifier for an account, when that > account already has a perfectly good, stable over time, but not > exposed and non dereferencable identifier of it's own. Hence my > previous mail. Don't agree. You have to give folks options. Anything less than that is a futile mandate. > > Best, > > Nathan > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2012 17:53:31 UTC