Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested

On 6/23/12 8:24 AM, Michiel de Jong wrote:
> It's a premise of webfinger that we resolve a human-memorable string
> of the form 'user@host' to accounts.

Yes, this is the crux of the matter.

Historically, there's always been a tension between natural keys (human 
readable) and system generated (non human readable) keys. As the Web 
evolves into a more structured data space comprised of data objects, the 
same tensions are resurfacing.

Opaque de-referencable keys (URIs) [1] require resolvers. For http: its 
in-built and widely adopted. For others, a resolver protocol is 
required. Webfinger [2] and Fingerpoint [3] .

What applies to acct: scheme URIs also applies to doi: lsid: etc.. The 
only issue is the cost of making a resolver that's adopted (primarily) 
by user agents of type: Web Browser.


1. -- URI opacity
2. -- Webfinger 
(ignore the "account" and "subject identity" conflation)
3. -- 
Fingerpoint .



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web:
Personal Weblog:
Twitter/ handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile:
LinkedIn Profile:

Received on Saturday, 23 June 2012 17:23:17 UTC