Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Kingsley Idehen
<> wrote:
> Hopefully,  you can see how this becomes a major HttpRange-14 imbroglio
> vector.

Dragging httpRange-14 into this discussion seems like a bad idea.

I don't want to take 2616 as sacrosanct, or to say the draft acct:
registration is right. Maybe the answer is to change the webfinger
draft to be clearer regarding the intended semantics.

(HTTPbis says more than 2616, and it is possible that the new text has
this function. But let's defer that question for now.)


Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 20:14:48 UTC