- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:58:56 -0400
- To: Jonathan Rees <rees@mumble.net>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Jonathan, It's probably just wishful thinking on my part, but the minutes of 24 May show: <trackbot> ACTION-478 -- Jonathan Rees to prepare a second draft of a finding on persistence of references, to be based on decision tree from Oct. 2010 F2F -- due 2012-04-24 -- OPEN <noah> JAR: Working on it, but not for F2F <noah> JAR: Maybe should talk to Larry <noah> ACTION-478 is a MAYBE for the F2F <noah> ACTION-478 Due 2012-07-10 As previously signaled, we seem to have open slots on the agenda, and this is a long running topic on which it would be nice to move forward. The above makes it look like you said "no" and I heard "maybe", but I'm hoping that's an oversimplification. Anyway: would it make sense for me to schedule a slot on persistence of references? Thank you. Noah
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 18:59:27 UTC