- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:50:08 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Of possible interest to the TAG, as it represents a proposed (if modest) update to RFC 3986. Noah -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:29:43 +0000 Resent-From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Resent-To: public-iri <public-iri@w3.org> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:29:37 -0400 From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Organization: World Wide Web Consortium To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> CC: uri@w3.org, draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid@tools.ietf.org, 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org On 2012-07-02 10:17, Martin J. Dürst wrote: > Hello Brian, > > I have read this, and it looks "good enough" to me. It's the second time > we have to formally update URI syntax because of IPv6, I hope it's the > last time :-). Thanks Martin. I also hope it's the last time. This gap was noticed (for the second time) due to people actually installing and debugging IPv6, so I suppose it corresponds to the "running code" motto. Brian > Regards, Martin. > > On 2012/06/29 0:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The draft "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Uniform Resource >> Identifiers", available in various formats at >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid/ , >> has passed WG Last Call in the IETF. Before it's submitted >> to the IESG, we'd appreciate comments from this list. If you >> happen to have seen an earlier version, please do look at the >> latest one (-01) which is substantially different. >> >> Please keep the CC's intact or add a CC to<ipv6@ietf.org>. >> >> Also please comment before July 4. >> >> Thanks >> Brian Carpenter >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 23:50:34 UTC