- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:52:27 +0900
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, 2012-01-26 05:52 -0800: > this html-wg issue concerns whether an undated url reference to another > specification is labeled as "work in progress" so that reviewers are > alerted to the loose binding. > > is that just a matter of taste with no substance? Maybe you can point out to me how actual behavior of conforming UAs that implement the spec would be affected by the proposed change. If you have time, maybe you can look at the following and point out what effect its resolution would have on conforming UAs - Consider reducing verbosity when talking about code points https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11124 The change proposed there requires literally hundreds of edits to the current spec. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:52:36 UTC