- From: Daniel Appelquist <dan@bluevia.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:07:32 +0000
- To: TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Hia folks - apologies for the late sending of this email, but the minutes
from the 19th of January are here:
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/19-minutes.html
Šand reproduced in convenient text-only form below. (LaTeX available on
request.)
--
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Technical Architecture Group Teleconference
19 Jan 2012
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-irc
Attendees
Present
Peter Linss, Ashok Malhotra, Jonathan Rees, Henry Thompson,
Noah Mendelsohn, Jeni Tennison, Yves Lafon, Dan Appelquist,
Robin Berjon, Thomas Roessler
Regrets
Larry Massinter
Chair
Noah Mendelsohn
Scribe
Dan Appelquist
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Admin
2. [5]Change proposal on httpRange-14
3. [6]Security Issues with Certificate Authorities
4. [7]Persistent References
5. [8]Microdata and RDFa
6. [9]Pending and Overdue Actions...
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
Admin
Noah: Welcome to Robin!
Dan: +1
Change proposal on httpRange-14
JAR: I want to know if anyone wants a look before it goes out
AM: Significant changes?
JAR: Many editorial
Some negotiation about how long
<noah> AM: OK, a couple of days
<noah> Thomas, probably time to dial soon, do you know where Harry
is?
<jar> tlr, hello
Noah: approval of prior minutes...
<DKA> Š Approve minutes of 15 december?
<noah> [11]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/12/15-minutes
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/12/15-minutes
<DKA> Recorded approved.
<DKA> Noah: Minutes of f2f? Some clean-up needed.
<DKA> Yves: I went through most of Friday's and have done some
correction. I can do Thursday's as well.
<DKA> Noah: One more week for formal approval.
<noah> Ht, are you dialing the tag?
<tlr> if you want to reschedule till we have Harry as well, that's
fine with me.
<DKA> Noah: congratulations also to Henry.
<DKA> Noah: Do we need to reopen question of teleconference times?
<DKA> +1 to congratulations to Henry!
<DKA> Noah: We have a f2f meeting hosted by Yves April
2-4Monday-Wednesday.
<DKA> Š we have an agreement to meet in June for next f2f.
<DKA> Š some risk of canceling next week's meeting.
<DKA> Noah: On status section of xml-html unification report, I
propose not to discuss it today.
<jar> F2F discussion:
[12]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/06-minutes#item09
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/06-minutes#item09
Security Issues with Certificate Authorities
Henry: so many [things html5 wg involved in] - is there anything
about securing web pages coming out of the html working group that
intersect with this concern (about https being broken)?
<noah> NM: Goal is to figure out whether TAG should invest in this,
and at the F2F we said we wante the benefit of Thomas' perspective
as W3C Security Domain lead
Š anyone pushing for something to be done about this?
[silence]
Noah: Thomas - are you aware of anyone other than the TAG engaging
this problem?
Thomas: What problem?
<jar> My guess is that HH brought the issue to us because he, at
least, didn't think it was adequately covered by other groups
<noah> E-mail form Harry Halpin:
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Dec/0083.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Dec/0083.html
Noah: We had an email from Harry Halpin that kicked this off with
the TAG.
<noah> E-mail title: "The CA system is spectacularly broken - can
the TAG help?"
Š email sets out the history in which people have had certificates
issued fraudulently. We think security on the Web is hugely
important. So now what?
Thomas: https is a protocol that relies on a certain trust
frameworkŠ That is working fine...
... you have at the protocol level, dependency on the CA system.
Š so what can be done to deal with that system?
Š one of the conversations going on in some quarters is about
perhaps modifying the distribution mechanisms for certs, create
channels that permit the holder of the domain name with the cert
authorities permitted to be used with it, etc...
Š another approach discussed is to use the DNS as a conveyance
mechanism for trust information. That could be reasonably sane given
DNSsec's deployment.
<noah> Curious, when Thomas says that techniques are "being
discussed", does this mean formally in responsible groups in the
IETF, or just informally among concerned techies?
<Yves> formally in the IETF, at least for DNSSEC
Š. if the industry goes in that direction we get reduced attack
surface. Right now if I have a domain name registered in .com in US
and someone in Lux issues a cert for that domain, that cert is
trusted.
Š the tactic of using DNSsec reduces the attack surface.
<noah> Can we get the name of the mailing list please?
Š DNSsec is an existing IETF standard. there is a working group
working on how to store certs. There is a possible BoF to discuss
additional [work] at next IETF.
Š the name of the mailing list is "the right key"
<Zakim> noah, you wanted to talk about https URI scheme and RFC 2818
Noah: we have been talking about protocols. It occurred to me that
this also relates to https URI scheme.
<noah> RFC 2818: [14]http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt
[14] http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt
Š RFC-2818.
Š In the section on server identity, it says:
<noah> "If the hostname is available, the client MUST check it
against the
<noah> server's identity as presented in the server's Certificate
message,
<noah> in order to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
<noah> "
<jar> this doesn't say how to do the checking.
Noah: so - architecturally this is called out not just in the https
protocol but in the definition of the correct resolution of URI
identifiers using that scheme. There is a sense that the namespace
of https schemes is validated by the CA system.
Thomas: this an informational IRC.
Noah: It's pointed to by IANA...
Thomas: it's modifiable.
Noah: I think it has some force in practice.
Ashok: Question - several of the approaches use a third party cert
certifier?
<noah> Noah is somewhat purplexed that RFC 2818 is the official
registration for one of the Web's most important URI schemes, but is
marked information. To a non-IETF wonk, this seems very, very
strange.
Thomas: all of these approaches [being discussed] at some point need
to establish a binding between the identifier and a cryptographic
key and some of them need to establish binding with a real life
identity. The way these schemes do this is to have a chain of
custody. DNS delegation - the key hierarchy that derives from dnssec
- could allow I myself to sign my own...
Š that is one approach. The other approach uses a third party that
is trusted. that is the traditional CA system.
Ashok: It turns out there are several possible solutions Do we have
to pick one? Or can we have a number of them that can be browser
specific or user -selected?
Thomas: If I want to reduce attack surface then I want to reduce the
mechanisms by which I can be attacked.
Š Users choosing authorities that they trust in real deployment is
usually a myth.
Š when have you last edited the list of CAs in your browser?
<tlr> one of the proposals: [15]https://www.eff.org/sovereign-keys
[15] https://www.eff.org/sovereign-keys
Noah: Is there a role for the TAG here?
<tlr> DANE working group:
[16]https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dane/charter/
[16] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dane/charter/
Š last year Jeff Jaffe asked us to highlight to him topics that we
felt might be threats to the Web. This will be on it.
Š beyond it the TAG has no plans to do anything other than discuss
today. Is there a way we can help?
Thomas: I was asking - is there something W3C can do to help? At
this particular juncture, I am trying to get a handle on what work
is in purview of W3C and what is in purview for IETF.
Š I think it's reasonable for the TAG to keep an eye on this topic.
Noah: Harry's note points to three specific proposals in the
community.
Š he feels the right organizational structures aren't in place and
maybe it's time for w3c to move.
Thomas: Harry will collaborate on this with Wendy - one question in
this domain is to figure out what piece of this we [w3c] should
address.
Noah: You as the domain lead have recommended that we keep an eye on
this. We are responding to a specific request from Harry. Maybe the
right thing is to publish the minutes and for me to take an action
to get back to Harry.
... Any objections?
Ashok: also ask him to keep us apprised.
Thomas: We'll be happy to keep the TAG informed.
<noah> ACTION: Noah to verify with Harry Halpin the TAG's plan to
"keep an eye" on CA issues, and solicit his and TLR's help in
keeping us informed Due: 2012-01-31 [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action01]
[17] http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action01
<trackbot> Created ACTION-663 - Verify with Harry Halpin the TAG's
plan to "keep an eye" on CA issues, and solicit his and TLR's help
in keeping us informed Due: 2012-01-31 [on Noah Mendelsohn - due
2012-01-26].
<noah> ACTION-663 Due 2012-01-31
<trackbot> ACTION-663 Verify with Harry Halpin the TAG's plan to
"keep an eye" on CA issues, and solicit his and TLR's help in
keeping us informed Due: 2012-01-31 due date now 2012-01-31
Thomas: There are some ideas floating around [about workshops] the
conversation is about a possible BoF at Paris IETF meeting. I sent
an email to the TAG mailing list. I [encourage] you to follow that
discussion.
<jar> maybe HH is worried that the browser folks aren't in good
communication with IETF?
Noah: Anyone willing to take a long-term action to watch for news in
this space?
... Thanks, Thomas.
Thomas: if we do a workshop it would be great to have someone from
the TAG on the program committee, for example.
Persistent References
Noah: Goal here is to look at this product page...
<noah> [18]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/persistence.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/persistence.html
Š to come out agreeing to his or to a revision of it or [dropping
the work]....
Henry: I have input from Larry and others which I have not
integrated yet.
Š I would prefer to put this off.
Noah: unless others object I think we should.
[agreement to put off]
<noah> Adding note to ACTION-528: Per brief discussion on 19 January
2012, this will not be scheduled for discussion until Henry Thompson
integrates agreed changes from Larry Masinter, and others, as
recorded in minutes of F2F and earlier calls.
<noah> ACTION-528?
<trackbot> ACTION-528 -- Henry Thompson to create and get consensus
on a product page and tracker product page for persistence of names
-- due 2012-01-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/528
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/528
Microdata and RDFa
<noah> ACTION-654?
<trackbot> ACTION-654 -- Jeni Tennison to write "product" page
summarizing wrapup of RDFa/Microdata work -- due 2012-01-31 --
PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [20]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/654
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/654
Noah: we did finish this discussion at the f2f. But we said "we nee
to leave tracks" - record the wrap-up in a final version of the TAG
product page.
<noah> F2F technical discussion:
[21]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/05-minutes#item02
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/05-minutes#item02
<noah> F2F project wrapup:
[22]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/05-minutes#item05
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/05-minutes#item05
<noah> To discuss today:
[23]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
Looks OK to me.
<noah> +1
Noah: Anyone feels this need more discussion?
<darobin> +1
<plinss> +1
<Yves> +1
Noah: [penning a proposed resolution]
<noah> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The draft product page at
[24]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html is agreed as
the basis on which the TAG closes out its work on Microdata/RDFa
coordination
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
+1
Noah: Any objections?
<noah> RESOLUTION: The draft product page at
[25]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html is agreed as
the basis on which the TAG closes out it's work on Microdata/RDFa
coordination
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
[passed without dissent]
<noah> close ACTION-654
<trackbot> ACTION-654 Write "product" page summarizing wrapup of
RDFa/Microdata work closed
Noah: propose to close action-654.
... I will take an action to announce the closing of our work on
this.
<noah> ACTION: Noah to announce completion of TAG work on
Microdata/RDFa as recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html and to
finalize the product page and associated links
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
<trackbot> Created ACTION-664 - Announce completion of TAG work on
Microdata/RDFa as recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html and to
finalize the product page and associated links [on Noah Mendelsohn -
due 2012-01-26].
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
Pending and Overdue Actions...
<noah>
[28]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
<noah> ACTION-350?
<trackbot> ACTION-350 -- Larry Masinter to revise
[29]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Oct/0075.html
based on feedback on www-tag and the feedback from TAG f2f
2009-12-09 discussion -- due 2011-11-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Oct/0075.html
<trackbot> [30]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/350
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/350
Noah: I took Larry's proposed text and copied it into email - we'll
discuss when larry's back.
<noah> ACTION-568?
<trackbot> ACTION-568 -- Noah Mendelsohn to draft note for Jeff
Jaffe listing 5 top TAG priorities as trackable items. -- due
2012-01-03 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [31]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/568
[31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/568
<noah> ACTION-563?
<trackbot> ACTION-563 -- Noah Mendelsohn to arrange for periodic TAG
key issues reports to Jeff per June 2011 F2F Due 2011-10-15 -- due
2012-01-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [32]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/563
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/563
<noah> close ACTION-568?
Noah: I'd like your proposal to close action-568 as it duplicates
action-563.
[no objection]
<noah> ACTION-578?
<trackbot> ACTION-578 -- Noah Mendelsohn to make sure HTML/XML work
gets TAG review when ready Due: 2011-08-01 -- due 2011-12-27 --
PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [33]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/578
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/578
<noah> close ACTION-578
<trackbot> ACTION-578 Make sure HTML/XML work gets TAG review when
ready Due: 2011-08-01 closed
Noah: review XML-html unification work. This was done at the f2f. I
propose to close it.
[no objections]
<noah> ACTION-591?
<trackbot> ACTION-591 -- Noah Mendelsohn to ping Norm end of Sept.
on revised HTML/XML report per discussion on 1 Sept 2011 -- due
2011-12-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [34]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/591
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/591
<noah> close ACTION-591
<trackbot> ACTION-591 Ping Norm end of Sept. on revised HTML/XML
report per discussion on 1 Sept 2011 closed
<noah> ACTION-599?
<trackbot> ACTION-599 -- Noah Mendelsohn to close out HTML5 review
product -- due 2011-12-20 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [35]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/599
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/599
Noah: I think I sent the closing note relating to action-599.
... I will leave this open and figure out what's going on here.
<noah> ACTION-602?
<trackbot> ACTION-602 -- Noah Mendelsohn to work with IETF liaisons
to propose possible TAG participation in IETF Paris -- due
2011-12-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [36]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602
Noah: There has been a notion we need to be better about liaising
the IETF. ...
Š when mark nottingham was here along with Philippe, I chatted with
them (the 2 liaisons) - they said the best part to attend [for me]
would be the early part but I don't think it's justified...
Henry: I think it would be a good use of w3c's money.
Š I think your should be there.
Noah: Floor is open for any suggestions for how to use that week
well - week before our meeting in the south of France.
... I'm going to re-open this and bump it so I get back to it.
<noah> Reopening ACTION-602, mostly to follow up on HT's advice that
Noah should attend, but also to see if other ideas come up for
liaison.
<noah> ACTION-602?
<trackbot> ACTION-602 -- Noah Mendelsohn to work with IETF liaisons
to propose possible TAG participation in IETF Paris -- due
2012-03-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [37]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602
<noah> ACTION-622?
<trackbot> ACTION-622 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule discussion of
html.next as possible new TAG work focus (per Edinburgh F2F)
[self-assigned] -- due 2011-12-20 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [38]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/622
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/622
<noah> close ACTION-622
<trackbot> ACTION-622 Schedule discussion of html.next as possible
new TAG work focus (per Edinburgh F2F) [self-assigned] closed
Noah: I thnk this happened. Objections to close?
[none heard]
<noah> ACTION-627?
<trackbot> ACTION-627 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule very detailed
line-by-line review of Pub&Linking draft at January F2F -- due
2012-01-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [39]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/627
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/627
<noah> NM: Jeni suggested not to do this for the F2F, question is
whether it's still worth doing?
<noah> DKA: I think probably still worth doing, because we had to
remove some things based on Rigo's guidance. Don't know if it's at
the right stage.
<noah> DKA: Jeni and I had a meeting, she took some "actions"
Noah: Discussion on this will be difficult without Jeni. We focused
on f2f agenda on a few key messages. I will re-open this action.
<noah> Reopening ACTION-627 until you're ready; make it pending when
you are.
<noah> ACTION-627?
<trackbot> ACTION-627 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule very detailed
line-by-line review of Pub&Linking draft at January F2F -- due
2012-01-31 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [40]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/627
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/627
<noah> ACTION-634?
<trackbot> ACTION-634 -- Noah Mendelsohn to with help from Noah to
publish
[41]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState-20111
130 as a TAG Finding -- due 2011-12-20 -- PENDINGREVIEW
[41]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState-20111130
<trackbot> [42]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/634
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/634
<noah> close ACTION-634
<trackbot> ACTION-634 With help from Noah to publish
[43]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState-20111
130 as a TAG Finding closed
[43]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState-20111130
<noah> ACTION-642?
<trackbot> ACTION-642 -- Jeni Tennison to with help from Larry to
propose plan to liaise with PLH to register HTML media type -- due
2012-01-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [44]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/642
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/642
<noah> ACTION-643?
<trackbot> ACTION-643 -- Larry Masinter to redraft something on this
html5 review in 3 weeks. -- due 2011-12-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [45]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/643
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/643
<ht> HST has to leave, I have (with some care) pushed all my overdue
deadlines out by varying amounts
<noah> The comment says:
<noah> This was also moved into the product page for HTML review, as
per ACTION-644.
<noah> Larry Masinter, 25 Dec 2011, 04:57:46
<noah> NM: I hear suggestions to close this.
<noah> close ACTION-643
<trackbot> ACTION-643 Redraft something on this html5 review in 3
weeks. closed
<noah> ACTION-644?
<trackbot> ACTION-644 -- Larry Masinter to draft proposed
alternative text to e-mail announcing end of "product" work on HTML
5 last call (
[46]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Dec/0041.html ) Due
2012-01-10 -- due 2012-01-10 -- PENDINGREVIEW
[46] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Dec/0041.html
<trackbot> [47]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/644
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/644
<noah> Leaving until I straighten out ACTION-599, also on HTML
closing
<noah> ACTION-653?
<trackbot> ACTION-653 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule telcon
discussion of Persistence product page (which was drafted for but
not reviewed at F2F -- due 2012-01-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [48]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/653
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/653
<jar> +1
<plinss> -1
I have to leave in ~5 minutes.
<noah> ACTION-609?
<trackbot> ACTION-609 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft initial cut at
[49]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/identifiers -- due
2011-10-25 -- OPEN
[49] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/identifiers
<trackbot> [50]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/609
[50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/609
<darobin> [I have to leave in a few minutes too, sorry]
<jar> I already have an action like this one
<noah> close ACTION-609
<trackbot> ACTION-609 Draft initial cut at
[51]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/identifiers closed
[51] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/identifiers
<noah> Due to Dan's departure.
<noah> ACTION-629?
<trackbot> ACTION-629 -- Daniel Appelquist to with help from Jeni to
propose changes to goals, success criteria etc. for
publishing/linking product page -- due 2012-01-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [52]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/629
[52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/629
<noah> close ACTION-629
<trackbot> ACTION-629 With help from Jeni to propose changes to
goals, success criteria etc. for publishing/linking product page
closed
<noah> ACTION-514?
<trackbot> ACTION-514 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft finding on API
minimization -- due 2011-10-18 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [53]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/514
[53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/514
<darobin> ACTION-662?
<trackbot> ACTION-662 -- Robin Berjon to redraft proposed product
page on API Minimization
([54]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html) --
due 2012-01-31 -- OPEN
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html)
<trackbot> [55]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662
[55] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662
Noah: I suggest I assign this to you with a proposed due date of 2
weeks.
<noah> ACTION-662?
<trackbot> ACTION-662 -- Robin Berjon to redraft proposed product
page on API Minimization
([56]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html) --
due 2012-01-31 -- OPEN
[56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html)
<trackbot> [57]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662
[57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662
Š to get your proposal on how to take this forward.
Š I will just bump the date on action-514 into the future
understanding that it's a placeholder.
<noah> ACTION-514?
<trackbot> ACTION-514 -- Robin Berjon to draft a finding on API
minimization -- due 2012-05-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [58]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/514
[58] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/514
<noah>
[59]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owne
r
[59] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner
<noah> ACTION-652?
<trackbot> ACTION-652 -- Yves Lafon to danA to come back with a
proposal on API minimization draft -- due 2012-01-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [60]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/652
[60] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/652
<noah> close ACTION-652
<trackbot> ACTION-652 DanA to come back with a proposal on API
minimization draft closed
<noah> ACTION-661?
<trackbot> ACTION-661 -- Ashok Malhotra to ask harry and thomas to
join us on a future TAG call. -- due 2012-01-13 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [61]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/661
[61] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/661
<noah> close ACTION-661
<trackbot> ACTION-661 Ask harry and thomas to join us on a future
TAG call. closed
<noah> ACTION: Noah to follow up with Harry Halpin on 19 January
2012 telcon discussion of CAs [recorded in
[62]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action03]
[62] http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action03
<trackbot> Created ACTION-665 - Follow up with Harry Halpin on 19
January 2012 telcon discussion of CAs [on Noah Mendelsohn - due
2012-01-26].
<noah> ACTION-646?
<trackbot> ACTION-646 -- Ashok Malhotra to with help from Noah,
update product page and product index to reflect publication of
Client-Side state finding -- due 2012-01-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [63]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/646
[63] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/646
<noah> close ACTION-646
<trackbot> ACTION-646 With help from Noah, update product page and
product index to reflect publication of Client-Side state finding
closed
<noah> ACTION-647?
<trackbot> ACTION-647 -- Ashok Malhotra to draft product page on
client-side storage focusing on specific goals and success criteria
Due: 2012-01-17 -- due 2012-01-11 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [64]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/647
[64] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/647
<noah> ACTION-523?
<trackbot> ACTION-523 -- Ashok Malhotra to (with help from Noah)
build good product page for client storage finding, identifying top
questions to be answered on client side storage -- due 2012-01-17 --
OPEN
<trackbot> [65]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/523
[65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/523
<noah> ACTION-632?
<trackbot> ACTION-632 -- Ashok Malhotra to frame issues around
client-side storage work -- due 2012-01-02 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [66]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/632
[66] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/632
<noah> close ACTION-523
<trackbot> ACTION-523 (with help from Noah) build good product page
for client storage finding, identifying top questions to be answered
on client side storage closed
<noah> 523 was duplicate of 647
<noah> ACTION-647 Due 2012-02-07
<trackbot> ACTION-647 Draft product page on client-side storage
focusing on specific goals and success criteria Due: 2012-01-17 due
date now 2012-02-07
<noah> ACTION-632 Due 2012-02-07
<trackbot> ACTION-632 Frame issues around client-side storage work
due date now 2012-02-07
<noah> ACTION-641?
<trackbot> ACTION-641 -- Noah Mendelsohn to try and find list of
review issues relating to HTML5 from earlier discussions -- due
2012-01-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [67]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641
[67] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641
<noah> ACTION-598?
<trackbot> ACTION-598 -- Yves Lafon to publish as a note what had
been the FPWD (Raman's draft) on client side state -- due 2012-01-15
-- OPEN
<trackbot> [68]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/598
[68] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/598
<noah> YL: I started working on the draft, will do it next week.
<noah> YL: Will send it to me.
<noah> ACTION-598 Due 2012-01-24
<trackbot> ACTION-598 Publish as a note what had been the FPWD
(Raman's draft) on client side state due date now 2012-01-24
<noah> ACTION-658?
<trackbot> ACTION-658 -- Yves Lafon to prepare telcon discussion of
protocol-related issues, e.g. Websockets/hybi (but not SPDY)Due:
2012-02-21 -- due 2012-01-13 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [69]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/658
[69] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/658
<noah> ACTION-658?
<trackbot> ACTION-658 -- Yves Lafon to prepare telcon discussion of
protocol-related issues, e.g. Websockets/hybi (but not SPDY) -- due
2012-02-21 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [70]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/658
[70] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/658
<noah> ACTION-638?
<trackbot> ACTION-638 -- Yves Lafon to help Noah figure out best
ways, if at all, for TAG to participate in IETF paris -- due
2011-12-20 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [71]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/638
[71] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/638
<noah> ACTION-638 Due 2012-02-15
<trackbot> ACTION-638 Help Noah figure out best ways, if at all, for
TAG to participate in IETF paris due date now 2012-02-15
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Noah to announce completion of TAG work on
Microdata/RDFa as recorded in
[72]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html and to
finalize the product page and associated links
[NEW] ACTION: Noah to follow up with Harry Halpin on 19 January 2012
telcon discussion of CAs [recorded in
[73]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Noah to verify with Harry Halpin the TAG's plan to
"keep an eye" on CA issues, and solicit his and TLR's help in
keeping us informed Due: 2012-01-31 [recorded in
[74]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action01]
[72] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
[73] http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action03
[74] http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-tagmem-minutes.html#action01
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [75]scribe.perl version 1.136
([76]CVS log)
$Date: 2012/02/03 18:11:19 $
[75] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[76] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 18:08:11 UTC