- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:23:39 +0000
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapps@w3.org, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Hi Tim, On Wednesday, 1 February 2012 at 16:42, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > Note that when people talk about installation, they often immediately discuss > packaging and manifest formats, which will need to be defined, Um… we have a REC for that, remember? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ > and for which > we might have more than one, but is not the crux of the issue -- the crux is > allowing it access to precious and/or sensitive resources. > Wow, I'm *really* doub-founded (yet) again. Tim, are my emails going to your spam folder or something? Or are you deliberately just ignoring the widget work the W3C already invested 6 years on? We already solved all this stuff in the Widgets specs. I don't know why you keep ignoring them? Please go and read: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/WidgetSpecs Please see: http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#the-feature-element-and-its-attributes Please see projects like PhoneGap and WAC (that make use of W3C widgets to enable device APIs): http://phonegap.com/ http://specs.wacapps.net/ -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 20:24:12 UTC