- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:44:24 -0800
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
This is a response to your note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0076.html that had a comment on the 9/30 draft. We discussed your comment and decided to address it by adding the sentence "In order to ground the semantics of fragment identifiers in applicable specifications, it is recommended that IETF media-type registration procedures be updated as suggested below." as the first sentence under RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MEDIA TYPE REGISTRATIONS The revised version is at: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState-20111130 Please let us know if this is satisfactory. Your original comment is copied below. I saw "All media type specifications and registrations, especially for new types, must specify fragment identifier semantics" while scrolling through it. This kind of wording is misleading considering that the TAG has no authority over the requirements for media type registrations. All the best, Ashok
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 17:44:35 UTC