W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Arrested - re: TAG ISSUE-25 deep linking

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:24:34 -0500 (EST)
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
cc: "Martin J. D?rst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103111217450.15542@wnl.j3.bet>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> It seems to me this approach is fundamentally different, from a Web
> Architecture _and_ a copyright perspective, from what
> e.g. cyclingfans.com [5] does, which is aggregate information about
> live streaming coverage of cycle races, using distant-references.  In
> particular, any attempt to describe the channelsurfing.net case as
> "just another deep-linking case" is at best a gross
> over-simplification.

There are two things here, linking to an existing and copyrighted source 
on the original site, and linking to copyrighted material copied on 
another site (without the author's consent).
Your cyclingfans.com example is the first case.

So we have the said material hosted on servers in country A, linking site 
being in country B and the user being in country C.

If country A does have a copyright law that allow copying without user 
content, is linking to it illegal in country B, if not, and if retrieving 
copied copyrighted material is illegal in country C, is the user doing 
something illegal ?

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Friday, 11 March 2011 17:24:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:09 UTC