- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:25:28 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
The agenda for the TAG teleconference of 23 June 2011 is now available at
[1,2], and in text-only form below. Thank you.
Noah
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/23-agenda
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
=================================================
[1]W3C | [2]TAG | Previous: [3]16 June 2011 This: [4]23 June 2011
Next: [5]14 July 2011
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/16-agenda
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/23-agenda
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/07/14-agenda
Agenda of 23 June 2011 TAG Teleconference
Nearby: [6]Teleconference details - [7]issues list - [8]open actions
- [9]pending review actions - [10]www-tag archive - [11]tag archive
1. Convene
+ Chair: Noah Mendelsohn, Scribe: Peter Linss (confirmed)
+ Roll call -- Regrets: Larry Masinter
+ Future regrets: Tim (14, 21 & 28 July); Larry (28 July)
+ Agenda Review - [12]this agenda
+ Next Meeting: 14 July 2011, Chair: Noah Mendelsohn
+ Future scribes: Yves Lafon, Jonthan Rees, Dan Appelquist
2. Approve minutes of prior meeting(s)
+ [13]6-8 June 2011 (F2F)
+ [14]16 June 2011
3. Administrative items
+ The teleconferences of 30 June and 7 July 2011 have be
cancelled
+ Summer telcons will be likely be held on the following
dates:
o Probable: 14 July, 21 July, 4 August
o Probably not: 28 July, 11 August, 18 August, 25 August
(the chair would like to meet on one more of those
August dates, but we would have low attendance)
o [15]Spreadsheet showing summer regrets (member-only,
.xls format)
+ The autumn F2F will be 13-15 September in Edinburgh, UK
+ The TAG will meet 4-6 January 2012 at the W3C offices at
MIT in Cambridge, MA
+ TAG members are to hold open the week of 2 April 2012 for
likely F2F meeting at the W3C offices at Sophia-Antipolis,
France (timed to follow Paris IETF meetings the previous
week)
4. [16]ISSUE-35 (RDFinXHTML-35-27): Microdata / RDFa relationship
+ Goals:
o Finalize feedback to the HTML WG, RDFa working groups
and/or W3C on microdata or RDFa
+ Background:
o We will discuss [17]e-mail from Jeni Tennison with
draft proposal of TAG position (member-only until
reviewed by the TAG) and [18]e-mail from the chair
(Noah)
o [19]ACTION-571: on - Jeni Tennison - Write up comments
on microdata and RDFa - Due: 2011-06-16 - OPEN
o [20]Discussion at 8 June TAG F2F
5. RFC 3023bis and IRI
+ Goals:
o Discuss coordination of technical issues relating to
emerging drafts for RFC 3023bis and IRI
o Decide whether TAG should be actively involved in
resolving any of these issues
+ Background:
o Henry [21]provides details of issues to be considered.
The following is adapted from Henry's note:
# [22]RFC 3023bis and fragment identifiers -- We
discussed this a year ago ([23]minutes) and came
to a conclusion, which Noah took to
[24]ACTION-441 to convey to the 3023 editors.
There was [25]substantial pushback. Jonathan
[26]reported on our further discussion to the
3023 editors, setting out a number of alternative
ways forward. Chris Lilley [27]replied stating a
preference for option 2. But nothing has
happened. . . Time to put a TAG push behind a new
draft of 3023bis?
# 3023bis and Processor Profiles -- The XML
Processing Model WG has produced a [28]Last Call
WD for XML Processing Profiles. Would 3023bis be
the architecturally correct place to connect this
to XML itself?
# IRIbis and HTML5 'URIs' -- The HTML WG has
removed all reference to 3987bis, but the IRI WG
is exploring ways to get back in (the following
is quoted from
[29]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ir
i/2011May/0026.html):
"In March 2011, the W3C's HTML WG made a decision to close
ISSUE-56 when the parties involved could not come to agreement
on aligning HTML5 with the IRI WG's revisions to RFC 3987:
[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#telcon
[7] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues
[8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/23-agenda
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-agenda
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/16-minutes
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/coordination/Summer2011Availability.xls
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/35
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0082.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0089.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/571
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/08-minutes.html#item06
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0005.html
[22] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/latest.html
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/06/9-minutes.html#item03
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/441
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/449
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/476
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Nov/0095.html
[28] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xml-proc-profiles-20110412/
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011May/0026.html
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0404.htm
l
"That decision effectively removed the HTML5 specification's
dependency on rfc3987bis. It appears that this was done so
that the HTML5 specification could define how to translate
input strings contained in text/html documents into URIs.
. . .
"However, our understanding is that ISSUE-56 can be reopened if
new information emerges, such as "IETF completing production of
a document suitable as a formal reference". And of course as
chairs of the IRI WG we would like to deliver such a document."
o [30]Paul Grosso notes: Also related to IRIbis is the
XML Core desire to be able to reference it normatively
from the XML and related specs for the definition of
LEIRIs as recorded at
[31]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-cor
e-wg/2011Mar/0022 among other places.
6. [32]ACTION-545: Privacy
+ Note: this was a F2F session that we never got to — Ashok
Malhotra had agreed to lead it
+ Goals:
o Review the [33]Report of the W3C Workshop on Web
Tracking and User Privacy (required reading)
o We will focus primarily, but not exclusively on "Do
Not Track" proposals
o Decide how the TAG will engage in privacy-related work
for the remainder of 2011
+ Background:
o [34]Report of the W3C Workshop on Web Tracking and
User Privacy (required reading)
o [35]ACTION-460: on - Daniel Appelquist - Coordinate
with IAB regarding next steps on privacy policy - Due:
2011-05-24 - OPEN
o [36]ACTION-550: on - Daniel Appelquist - With help
from Noah to plan TAG work on privacy, leading to
session at F2F, next step is contact with TLR - Due:
2011-05-12 - OPEN
o [37]ACTION-507: on - Daniel Appelquist - With Noah to
suggest next steps for TAG on privacy - Due:
2011-05-03 - CLOSED
o [38]ACTION-545: on - Ashok Malhotra - Report to TAG,
after privacy workshop, regarding architecture issue
on privacy and especially degree to which use cases
beyond those addressed by "Do Not Track" need
attention - Due: 2011-05-03 - CLOSED
o Earlier background:
# IETF/W3C Privacy workshop was held at MIT 8-98
December 2011. "Action Items" for W3C were
proposed. See: [39]Action items (PDF - may need
rotating) collected at IETF/W3C Privacy Workshop
wrapup
# [40]ACTION-264: on - Ashok Malhotra - Draft
agenda item for upcoming telcon discussion of
geolocation and privacy - Due: 2009-08-04 -
CLOSED
# [41]ACTION-290: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Write to
Geolocation WG saying "we have concern that the
spec does not say enough user privacy" - Due:
2009-07-30 - CLOSED
# [42]ACTION-408: on - Daniel Appelquist - Look
into next steps on a workshop around device APIs,
privacy etc. with tlr - Due: 2010-03-31 - CLOSED
# [43]ACTION-506: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Noah to
bring proposed W3C Actions on Privacy before the
TAG - TLR to report back to IETF - Due:
2011-01-11 - CLOSED
# Papers from earlier IETF/W3C workshop on privacy
were at
[44]http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/privacy/Pr
ivacy_Workshop_Papers.zip but that link appears
not to work any more ([45]ACTION-490: on - Noah
Mendelsohn - Noah and others(?) going to privacy
workshop to report back to the TAG? - Due:
2010-12-21 - CLOSED) ([46]ACTION-506: on - Noah
Mendelsohn - Noah to bring proposed W3C Actions
on Privacy before the TAG - TLR to report back to
IETF - Due: 2011-01-11 - CLOSED)
7. Overdue Action Items:
+ [47]Overdue actions in [48]Tracker
8. Pending Review Items:
+ [49]Pending review actions in [50]Tracker
9. Any other business
_________________________________________________________
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0007.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0022
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/545
[33] http://www.w3.org/2011/track-privacy/report
[34] http://www.w3.org/2011/track-privacy/report
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/460
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/550
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/507
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/545
[39]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Dec/att-0061/ActionItems_Workshop.pdf
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/264
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/290
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/408
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/506
[44]
http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/privacy/Privacy_Workshop_Papers.zip
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/490
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/506
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
Noah Mendelsohn for the TAG
$Revision: 1.1 $ of $Date: 2011/06/22 14:23:36 $
[51]Valid XHTML 1.1
[51] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 14:25:54 UTC