- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:59:36 -0700
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Here's a curiosity... section 2 of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-00
says
"The <fragment> part ... is only
applicable to URN Namespaces that specifically opt to support its
usage. Thus, a URN Namespace registration document MAY specify the
usage of <fragment> with URNs of that particular URN Namespace."
which to my eye contradicts RFC 3986
"the fragment identifier is not used in the scheme-specific
processing of a URI"
This is just a draft, and I'm not suggesting we get involved in the
URNbis process. But we might add the inclination expressed here to the
catalog of pressures conspiring to weaken (or reform) fragment id
semantics.
Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2011 06:00:03 UTC