- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:40:41 -0500 (EST)
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, www-tag@w3.org
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> The only exchange I recall was about the
>> recombine-fragids-when-redirect-location-has-a-fragid issue.
>
> The message I was looking for was sent several years ago, communicated
> possibly by Henry, following TAG discussion of the topic, and it said
> something about how resource owners (or whomever) were responsible for
> making sure that representations (such as those arising from conneg
> parameter modulation) were consistent with one another. It didn't
> mention fragids but IIRC could have been interpreted as applying to
> them.
The reference is here [1] no?
I don't recall an exchange between ietf-http-wg and the TAG on that
subject.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/#frag-coneg
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 16:40:45 UTC