- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:59:36 +0000
- To: <Misha.Wolf@thomsonreuters.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Misha writes: > A reminder that the IPTC and its member News Agencies are using very > widely the IPTC's alternative to CURIEs and QNames, called QCodes. > The differences between CURIEs and QCodes are: Thanks. > . . . > - While the creators of RDFa stated that the current mechanism for > alias definition is to be considered simply one of a set of > possible mechanisms, I think that it is currently the only > specified mechanism. We (the IPTC) rejected that mechanism as > too verbose and created, instead, our catalog. A brief summary of how this works, with an example or two, would be very welcome, please. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNSnyIkjnJixAXWBoRAvX6AJ43iIjoW9JY2nx7p8e7biU0FbfKxQCfd1i9 FSumLdejViSmME+ISWr5II8= =D1FY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 10:00:10 UTC