- From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:58 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- CC: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Nathan wrote: > FWIW, duri scheme appears perfectly clear, tdb with fragments or where a > doc describes multiple things (_Things_ described by) isn't so clear. As I understand it, and given the typical handling of URI#frag using RDF, tdb: with fragments is probably redundant. But there have been situations where some way of using URIs without fragids in similar fashion was desired, which is where I think tdb: comes in to play. To riff on your earlier example (and adopting Jonathan's suggestion to drop the date in tdb, which I liked): [[ <http://webr3.org/nathan> a document primarily about me <http://webr3.org/nathan#me> me ]] <tdb:http://webr3.org/nathan> could be another way of referring to the same thing as <http://webr3.org/nathan#me> The ideas in Larry's draft have been kicking around, and periodically resurfacing, for a long time now and I think it's about time to move them to a stable and citable form (at least experimental) so we can see if they find any traction in the wider web. #g
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 16:15:47 UTC