Le 11-juin-10 à 10:53, Martin J. Dürst a écrit :
> But that's all for the purpose of conserving as much of the content
> across widely differing applications, rather than for confusing or
> annoying the user.
This whole thread says it: there's no way in a spec to differentiate
between annoying the user and providing a useful service to the user.
Except if... you are the user.
On 2010/06/06 11:40, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Are there general WYSIWYG principles for copy-to-clipboard?
I wish I'd find them.
This sounds to be a field where developers have been doing nice
services since ages but where no literature tells you "the right thing".
> [....]
> Are there other examples of "smart copy"?
I believe Macs and PCs offer lots of such examples. Here's a few, they
are smart because they do the right thing to a normal user; they do
change the content by injecting things into it.
- from Adobe Illustrator to Apple Preview or Quark X Press, you copy
and paste a vector PDF (but you could also get a raster image which
Illustrator has rasterized if going to Photoshop)
- from FireFox to a spreadsheet you have a chance to copy a table
rectangle
- from MSIE to Word and from Safari to Pages, I believe you can copy a
piece of RTF or HTML that looks a lot like the original
For HTML-originating copy, I had a frequent experience that all links
are absolutized. Which can be viewed as a useful or useless service.
Where there's almost nothing thus far is when server work, for example
the wiki source markup of a presented wiki page.
paul