- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:55:22 -0600
- To: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 02:24 -0800, Tyler Close wrote: > I understand that sometimes meaning is lost in email and especially in > meeting transcripts, so I just want to check that I understand the > current status of the discussion on ACTION-278. The most relevant bit of the record is: [[ JAR: I'll take an action to drill down on the usecases Noah: Shall we add that to Action-278 and change the due date <noah> ACTION-278: Due 2010-02-04 <trackbot> ACTION-278 Draft changes to 2.7 of Metadata in URIs to cover the "Google Calendar" case notes added ]] i.e. the action remains open. [...] > 4. The TAG is currently sticking to its finding that prohibits use of > the web-key technique We made no such decision in the 21 Jan meeting. I can't see anything in the record that suggests we did, so I don't see any way to clarify the record. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Saturday, 23 January 2010 20:55:24 UTC