- From: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:30:57 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "www-tag" <www-tag@w3.org>, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>, "Thinh Nguyen" <thinh@creativecommons.org>, "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org>, "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Personally, I think the issue is too important to ignore but I appreciate how hard it must be to find the specialised resources to address it. ---Rotan ------- (sent via mobile) ------- On 22 Apr 2010, at 17:55, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 12:44 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:15 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: >> [...] >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/322 >>> >>> I'm working with Rigo and others to find people qualified >>> to research the legal as well as technical aspects. >>> >>> A somewhat arbitrary estimate on when I'll have news is >>> end of January. >> >> The search for qualified (and *available*) writing >> resources continues. >> >> I bumped the due date back to 2010-03-23 in tracker; >> perhaps we'll have more news then. > > That was a month ago, and there's still not much news > in the way of resources. (though we have seen some > news about deep linking in general). > > Is it useful for me to keep my finger in the dike > for another few months? Or should I just withdraw > this action? > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E >
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 17:32:16 UTC