- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:39:00 -0700
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: raman@google.com, www-tag@w3.org
It came out in that order as I typed it ... There are actually a lot more questions to be asked --- I wanted to get something out before it got too long-winded. Dan Connolly writes: > I'm a little confused by the formatting of the list in the > Conclusion section... it seems like the questions > should go in the ordered list and the answers > should go after the list, but I'm not sure; > could you clarify? > > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:59 -0700, T.V Raman wrote: > [...] > > 2. > > 2 Conclusion > > So to conclude, let's ask the original question: > > > > 1. Given a URL, what can a user expect to be able to do with it, > > after having dereferenced the URI? > > 2. How does the user discover what software bits he needs in > > order to consume the received HTTP Response? > > 3. In Web 1.0 (Web of documents) the answer was simple --- HTTP > > Response header Content-Type specified the media type, which > > in turn specified what the recipiant needed to understand. > > 4. A recipiant who only understands mime-type text/html in this > > example is likely to flee screaming in terror if he makes the > > mistake of doing Show Source. > > 5. We all acknowledge that Show Source helped Web 1.0 succeed. > > 6. Q: What is the equivalent of Show Source that will help us > > collectively take the Web to the next level? > > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:39:30 UTC