- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:36:01 -0600
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Larry, when you and I talked about your conneg stuff in HTTP, I thought there was no relevant follow-up, but now I see Henry has an action that follows on: ACTION-231 on Larry Masinter: Draft replacement for \"how to use conneg \" stuff in HTTP spec - due 2009-11-18 - pending review http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/231 ACTION-232 on Henry S. Thompson: Follow-up to Hausenblas once there's a draft of HTTPbis which has advice on conneg - due 2009-12-01 - open Did the HTTPbis WG accept your changes? I can follow my nose from your action to an HTTPbis ticket... http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/81 but I'm not sure how to read the status. I see: Changed 7 weeks ago by mnot@pobox.com ¶ * severity set to Active WG Document * milestone changed from unassigned to 08 Changed 12 days ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de ¶ * milestone changed from 08 to 09 and "(reopened design)" at the top... so it looks like the WG hasn't decided. But I don't really know how the HTTPbis WG makes/records decisions. I guess it's clear enough that there isn't an Internet Draft with the new wording... unless I'm missing something. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 07:36:10 UTC