- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:32:12 -0600
- To: www-tag@w3.org
At our Nov meeting in Santa Clara, we pretty much polished
off the binaryXML issue...
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/11/06-minutes.html#item04
We actioned Noah to close the loop with the EXI WG (which he has done;
cf http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/328 )
but we didn't record a decision to close the issue.
I don't see any reason not to.
That is: I propose that the EXI spec of 19 Sep
addresses TAG issue binaryXML-30.
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/30
If I can get a second (and no objections) by email,
that would put us in a good position to record
a decision quickly at our next meeting.
Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0
W3C Working Draft 19 September 2008
NOTE: This is the Last Call working draft.
This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-exi-20080919/
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 03:32:15 UTC