- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:05:59 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > If I can get a second (and no objections) by email, > that would put us in a good position to record > a decision quickly at our next meeting. Second. Thanks. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org 11/24/2009 10:32 PM To: www-tag@w3.org cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) LC spec addresses ISSUE-30 (binaryXML-30)? At our Nov meeting in Santa Clara, we pretty much polished off the binaryXML issue... http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/11/06-minutes.html#item04 We actioned Noah to close the loop with the EXI WG (which he has done; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/328 ) but we didn't record a decision to close the issue. I don't see any reason not to. That is: I propose that the EXI spec of 19 Sep addresses TAG issue binaryXML-30. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/30 If I can get a second (and no objections) by email, that would put us in a good position to record a decision quickly at our next meeting. Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0 W3C Working Draft 19 September 2008 NOTE: This is the Last Call working draft. This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-exi-20080919/ Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 04:06:40 UTC