- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:03:15 +0300
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Agreed. Tim On 2009-11 -25, at 06:32, Dan Connolly wrote: > At our Nov meeting in Santa Clara, we pretty much polished > off the binaryXML issue... > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/11/06-minutes.html#item04 > > We actioned Noah to close the loop with the EXI WG (which he has done; > cf http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/328 ) > but we didn't record a decision to close the issue. > I don't see any reason not to. > > That is: I propose that the EXI spec of 19 Sep > addresses TAG issue binaryXML-30. > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/30 > > If I can get a second (and no objections) by email, > that would put us in a good position to record > a decision quickly at our next meeting. > > Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0 > W3C Working Draft 19 September 2008 > NOTE: This is the Last Call working draft. > This version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-exi-20080919/ > Latest version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/ > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 November 2009 09:02:12 UTC