Re: Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) LC spec addresses ISSUE-30 (binaryXML-30)?

Agreed.
Tim

On 2009-11 -25, at 06:32, Dan Connolly wrote:

> At our Nov meeting in Santa Clara, we pretty much polished
> off the binaryXML issue...
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/11/06-minutes.html#item04
>
> We actioned Noah to close the loop with the EXI WG (which he has done;
> cf http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/328 )
> but we didn't record a decision to close the issue.
> I don't see any reason not to.
>
> That is: I propose that the EXI spec of 19 Sep
> addresses TAG issue binaryXML-30.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/30
>
> If I can get a second (and no objections) by email,
> that would put us in a good position to record
> a decision quickly at our next meeting.
>
> Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0
> W3C Working Draft 19 September 2008
> NOTE: This is the Last Call working draft.
> This version:
>        http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-exi-20080919/
> Latest version:
>        http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 26 November 2009 09:02:12 UTC