- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:22:06 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > ... > HTTP Link: it's a URI reference, and in RDFa, (I assume, I haven't > looked closely) it's a CURIE. > ... But RDFa talks about link/@rel, which RDFa doesn't own. If HTML5 later on decides to allow URIs in link/@rel (and I think I've seen several proposals that go into that direction), then we have another conflict between the RFDa community and the WHATWG crowd. This one could be easily avoided by requiring a safe CURIE. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 19:22:51 UTC