text/staticHTML and content security policy [was: Sniffing and HTTP-bis]

Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> [...]
> That is, supposing there were a media type text/staticHTML, which
> meant, effectively, interpret as HTML with noscript applying
> throughout.
FYI,  that, among other things, is expressible using the Content 
Security Proposal.

It introduces an HTTP X-Content-Security-Policy header field
(which can be expressed using <meta http-equiv>).

p.s. tracker, I'd like more bonus points for this msg under ACTION-323 .


Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 18:03:45 UTC