- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:03:35 -0600
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Henry S. Thompson wrote: > [...] > That is, supposing there were a media type text/staticHTML, which > meant, effectively, interpret as HTML with noscript applying > throughout. FYI, that, among other things, is expressible using the Content Security Proposal. http://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/Content_Security_Policy It introduces an HTTP X-Content-Security-Policy header field (which can be expressed using <meta http-equiv>). p.s. tracker, I'd like more bonus points for this msg under ACTION-323 . -- Dan
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 18:03:45 UTC