Re: An HTML language specification

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, John Kemp wrote:
> All I was suggesting was that the exact same HTML5 language which is 
> being defined in the current HTML5 draft is put into a separate 
> document, describing only the actual language. I believe that is what 
> Michael has already attempted.
> I fail to see how that particular operation affects the possibility to 
> achieve well-defined specifications or interoperable implementations.

Mike's document doesn't contain implementation requirements. I'm not sure 
how to extend Mike's pattern to a spec that also includes implementation 
requirements. For a simple example, consider <video src="">, whose 
implementation definition is deeply integrated with the definition of the 
HTMLMediaElement API. How would you separate the two cleanly?

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 21:12:27 UTC