- From: John Kemp <john.kemp@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:41:57 -0500
- To: ext Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: ext Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
ext Lachlan Hunt wrote: > John Kemp wrote: >> Are we not then talking simply about a modularity issue? >> >> In other words, would it not be possible to make a normative HTML5 >> language specification, and then reference that specification from >> another that defined APIs and so on? >> >> One definitive source for the language, and a further definitive >> source for the API, referencing the language specification. > > It has already been pointed out that that is effectively the model used > by the HTML4 and DOM 2 HTML specs, and it has been shown to be a rather > ineffective model for achieving well defined specifications and > interoperable implementations. All I was suggesting was that the exact same HTML5 language which is being defined in the current HTML5 draft is put into a separate document, describing only the actual language. I believe that is what Michael has already attempted. I fail to see how that particular operation affects the possibility to achieve well-defined specifications or interoperable implementations. Regards, - johnk
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 15:42:58 UTC