Re: TAG recommends against XRI

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress writes:

> Noah included the question:
> "Also, could you let us know what steps, if any, you have taken towards
> registration of 'xri' as a URI scheme with the IETF?"
>
> It was an un-numbered question, and OASIS appears to have answered the
> numbered questions only, and not this one. Was there any follow-up? Assuming
> not, what do we think the answer is?

I personally took their silence on that point to mean "no steps have
been taken".  Like Mark Baker, I have seen no sign of any attempt to
register 'xri' as a URI scheme.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINZymkjnJixAXWBoRAn34AJ9nBexWDUo1tf7VSjc5RpUiW8effgCfdzUq
R2vK8u0BslrAbvYlUlSHFNA=
=dgY0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2008 16:18:21 UTC