Re: Uniform access

On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:

> At the TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol on 20 May 2008, the TAG  
> took up the issue of the appropriate use (if any) of the HTTP Link:  
> response header, with consideration of design alternatives and  
> issues as summarized in [2]. After a lively discussion, we agreed  
> as follows:
>
> "The TAG endorses http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http- 
> link-header-01.txt and standardization of the HTTP Link: header for  
> use cases such as POWDER and metadata about fixed resources, and  
> GRDDL transformation links"

Why mention of "fixed resources" specifically? Is this meant to  
supply that responses to requests about "generic resources" should  
not use link headers?

-Alan