Re: Uniform access

On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:

> At the TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol on 20 May 2008, the TAG  
> took up the issue of the appropriate use (if any) of the HTTP Link:  
> response header, with consideration of design alternatives and  
> issues as summarized in [2]. After a lively discussion, we agreed  
> as follows:
> "The TAG endorses 
> link-header-01.txt and standardization of the HTTP Link: header for  
> use cases such as POWDER and metadata about fixed resources, and  
> GRDDL transformation links"

Why mention of "fixed resources" specifically? Is this meant to  
supply that responses to requests about "generic resources" should  
not use link headers?


Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 14:03:23 UTC