- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:47:05 +0900
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
this
Le 13 juin 2008 à 04:42, Jonathan Rees a écrit :
> They think (a) that their naming system if http-based would
> catastrophically fail if DNS failed in one of these ways, and (b)
> that they can set up a naming system that is more abstract and
> timeless than is http: so that DNS risks are avoided.
and this
> Scientists in particular are anti-authority, and naturally gravitate
> to systems like LSID that eliminate any reference to anything they
> don't control.
makes me think of the (evil?) idea of using RFC2606 [1]
.test
.example
.invalid
.localhost
and
example.com
example.net
example.org
[1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606#section-2
--
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 01:47:42 UTC