Re: Draft minutes of W3C TAG Teleconference of 4 Dec 2008

Dan Connolly wrote:

> I think I said "where that src can be a reference within the widget".

My apologies for the confusion.   The draft minutes [1] have been updated.

Noah

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/12/04-minutes

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
12/05/2008 09:59 AM
 
        To:     www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
        cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        Re: Draft minutes of W3C TAG Teleconference of 4 
Dec 2008



On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 08:38 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 19:19 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: 
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/12/04-minutes.html

> Issue uriBasedPackageAccess-61
[...]
>    <noah> DC: The Web app groups needs URIs because they need to use
>    DOM APIs.
> 
>    DC: They have explained -- WebApps need URIs, because their system
>    context is the DOM API, e.g. <img src="...."/>, where that src can
>    be a widget

I think I said "where that src can be a reference within the widget".

Usually I wouldn't bother with a correction that small, but I
gather this has been the source of some concern:

# [14:28] <arve> DC: They have explained -- WebApps need URIs, because
their system context is the DOM API, e.g. <img src="...."/>, where that
src can be a widget 
  * # [14:29] <arve> from the TAG meeting 
  * # [14:29] <arve> that's not exactly what we meant, no 

 -- http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20081205#l-48

I was just trying to relay what I heard in
the 20 Oct TPAC joint TAG/WebApps session:

[[
DanC: Where do widget: get resolved?

timeless: In the DOM, where .source must be resolvable.
... For example, in img.src.
]]
 -- http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#item12


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Friday, 5 December 2008 15:16:44 UTC