- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:59:09 -0600
- To: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 08:38 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 19:19 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/12/04-minutes.html > Issue uriBasedPackageAccess-61 [...] > <noah> DC: The Web app groups needs URIs because they need to use > DOM APIs. > > DC: They have explained -- WebApps need URIs, because their system > context is the DOM API, e.g. <img src="...."/>, where that src can > be a widget I think I said "where that src can be a reference within the widget". Usually I wouldn't bother with a correction that small, but I gather this has been the source of some concern: # [14:28] <arve> DC: They have explained -- WebApps need URIs, because their system context is the DOM API, e.g. <img src="...."/>, where that src can be a widget * # [14:29] <arve> from the TAG meeting * # [14:29] <arve> that's not exactly what we meant, no -- http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20081205#l-48 I was just trying to relay what I heard in the 20 Oct TPAC joint TAG/WebApps session: [[ DanC: Where do widget: get resolved? timeless: In the DOM, where .source must be resolvable. ... For example, in img.src. ]] -- http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#item12 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 5 December 2008 14:59:48 UTC