- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:08:59 +0900
- To: Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, 2008-12-03 07:59 -0800: > Michael Smith wrote: > > The new list is now ready to go: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pkg-uri-scheme/ > > But the original suggestion from Larry Masinter [1] was: > > I realize that we've moved from discussing ZIP packages and URI references into them to a deeper > > I realize that we've moved from discussing ZIP packages and URI references into them to a deeper > > discussion of the role of architecture and orthogonality, language specifications > > vs. implementation guidelines, the handling of error conditions in > > standards documents, and the interplay of extensibility vs. consistency of behavior. > > I think that's important, but perhaps should be handled with a narrower mailing list > > I think that's important, but perhaps should be handled with a narrower mailing list Actually, that suggestion for another mailing list was made after the original suggestion (some time back, last month) for a specific mailing list for a package-URI-scheme discussion. The list was set up in response to that suggestion from last month. > Is the new list to discuss the specific topic of URI references > in ZIP packages, Yes, for that specific purpose. > or the larger architectural topics raised in Ian Hickson's > message [2] to which Larry was replying? To me at least, those seem like topics that appropriate for discussion on www-tag, and the discussion about them might better continue here than being moved to a new list. --Mike > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Dec/0022.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Nov/0125.html -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 16:09:39 UTC