- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:19:01 +0100
- To: wangxiao@musc.edu
- CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, W3C-TAG Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Unless you can come up with a *new* argument that is not already > found in one of the following threads > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0150.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/0071.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0092.html I completely agree with you on all points. And I sincerely wish that is also a consensus among TAG members and web community in general. If so, I wish them to be included in the writing of AWWW and httpRange-14. If not, which I feel is the case, at least from the feedback on this thread and other mailing list, it is not a waste of time. There is the need to continue push this understanding to become a consensus until no question like "is this or that an information resource?" is asked and until no one will say that according to httpRange-14, that "http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/PatHayes" is wrong. Regards, Xiaoshu
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 11:19:27 UTC