- From: Mikael Nilsson <mikael@nilsson.name>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:48:36 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: wangxiao@musc.edu, W3C-TAG Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>
ons 2007-10-24 klockan 02:18 -0700 skrev Roy T. Fielding: > Unless you can come up with a *new* argument that is not already > found in one of the following threads > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0150.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/0071.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0092.html > > then this discussion is just another waste of time. The 303 > solution exists only for the sake of those resource owners that > wish to make the distinction. It has no need of an agreement from > anyone else, nor does it have any effect on Web architecture, > and it need not be implemented by people who don't share the > desire for such a distinction. How can you say that in a thread that discusses the possibility of formalizing this distinction in a "HTTP semantics"? It seems to me that such a formalization *would* require people to follow the proposal. /Mikael > It simply exists for those who > believe they have a need for it, whether they actually do or > not, and it isn't up to us (or anyone else) to decide that need > for them when it's their own URIs that are being defined with > a given set of semantics that they can control, even if that > notion of control is only a fantasy that might become untrue > over time. > > ....Roy > > -- <mikael@nilsson.name> Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 09:48:31 UTC