- From: Rhys Lewis <rhys@volantis.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 04:08:38 -0600 (MDT)
- To: "'Williams, Stuart \(HP Labs, Bristol\)'" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: "'Pat Hayes'" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "'Booth, David \(HP Software - Boston\)'" <dbooth@hp.com>, "'Technical Architecture Group WG'" <www-tag@w3.org>
Hello Stuart, > No... I mean the intended (by the owner/baptiser/deployer of) > referent of the URI - a webarch:Resource a.k.a a thing. Ok, in which case there is still clear blue water between us :) >> >> Really? It seems to me that you have to say something about the >> http:resource that is identified by the racine. > ^^^^^^^^^^ > Hmmmm.... > "identified" meaning "referred to" or "denoted by" ? > or "identified" meaning "access using" ? > > I read the former... which I take to be the webarch:Resource > ie. a thing referred to by the URI. > But in this particular case, (information resources referred to by http URIs) my description of the process says that they are the same. To clarify, the webarch:resource referred to by the racine is an information resource and hence is the http:resource. Best wishes Rhys
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 10:08:57 UTC