RE: Fw: TAG Finding: The use of Metadata in URIs

Hi Dan,
Thanks. It's the inveterate editor in me I guess. Damn, now I'll have to go
google "inveterate" to make sure I'm using the right word. :-)
Ta,
Howard
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] 
 > Sent: June 19, 2007 10:56 AM
 > To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
 > Cc: www-tag@w3.org; Howard Katz
 > Subject: Re: Fw: TAG Finding: The use of Metadata in URIs
 > 
 > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 17:18 -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
 > > With his permission, I am forwarding the attached comments 
 > from Howard 
 > > Katz regarding the Metadata in URI TAG finding.  My 
 > inclination is to fix 
 > > these editorial problems in place, I.e. without changing 
 > the date on the 
 > > finding.
 > 
 > Yes, these changes look OK to make in-place.
 > 
 > Thanks for the attention to detail, Howard.
 > 
 > > "Howard Katz" <howardk@fatdog.com>
 > > 05/26/2007 02:54 PM
 > >  
 > >         To:     <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
 > >         cc: 
 > >         Subject:        TAG Finding: The use of Metadata in URIs
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Noah,
 > > Nice work on the Use of Metadata finding. I noticed a few 
 > typos I thought
 > > you might want to know about:
 > > 
 > > 1) The heading for "2.8 Confusing or malicious metadata": should be
 > > left-aligned.
 > > 
 > > 2) The Good Practice note in the same section: the word 
 > "consistent" is
 > > misspelled as "constistent".
 > 
 > -- 
 > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
 >

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 18:38:16 UTC