- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:04:15 -0500
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 16:03 +0900, Karl Dubost wrote: [...] > If [profile attribute][1] was dropped, could it be replaced by > something else? > If can't be replaced by something else, why it is really fundamental > to keep it? > > > Example: > > * with profile attribute > > <head profile="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/ http:// > gmpg.org/xfn/11"> > > > * without profile attribute > > <LINK rel="profile dcq-html" > type="text/html" > href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html"> > <LINK rel="profile xfn" > type="text/html" > href="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11"> > Do you mean reserving rel="profile" for this use in the HTML 5 spec? If so, that's just like taking back class="vcard". If not, how is rel="profile" grounded? > I wonder if authoring tools (CMS, forms, standalone applications) > make it easier to edit the link more than head. I should try to > review that. > > > > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.4.4.3 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 13:04:46 UTC