Re: http-range-14 303 issue, request for reopening the discussion

Julian Reschke wrote:
> As far as the IETF errata "process" is concerned, it is already an 
> erratum -- the RFC Editor's errata page links to 
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/>, and over 
> there, the issue is recorded as 
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i71> (along 
> with Roy's proposed replacement text)

Sorry, it's <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i70>.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:02:21 UTC