- From: Mikael Nilsson <mikael@nilsson.name>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:26:50 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@miscoranda.com>, www-tag@w3.org
On tis, 2007-12-18 at 02:16 -0800, Pat Hayes wrote: > >On tis, 2007-12-18 at 01:58 -0800, Pat Hayes wrote: > >> There is no such thing, I suggest, as > >> a webarch:representation of an RDF graph, just as > >> there is no such thing as one of the number zero > >> or the fourth moon of Jupiter. > > > > > >If I can't faithfully represent the number 0 using a message, I don't > >know of anything I can faithfully represent. > > Which is why I think the 'faithfully represent' > criterion is incorrect. I think it was meant to > capture a case like the HTML case, where what is > transmitted is pretty much an exact copy of the > resource itself, but to be generalized to cases > like scripted HTML, a reduced image, a webcam or > a clock, etc.. ; but that cases like numbers and > RDF graphs are in fact counterexamples which show > that the criterion as stated isn't in fact > adequate to capture the intended intuitions. I can't for the world see how numbers and RDF graphs can fall into the same category. But let's stay with RDF graphs.... FWIW, an HTML page is a set of tags, organized in a tree. What makes that different from an RDF graph? I I'd like some of that "intuition" too :-/ /Mikael > Certainly a number is *not* something that can be > rationally thought of as being at the end of an > HTTP protocol, or that can have operations > performed on it by a POST. > > Pat > > >/Mikael > > > >> > >> Pat > >> > >> > > >> >/Mikael > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Compare sending a numeral in some text, using some > >> >> numerical convention, vs. sending an actual number. Maybe if > >> >> 'lossless' is the sole criterion, then numbers are IRs also, since > >> >> the literal "123"^^xsd:number seems to be an encoding of the number > >> >> one hundred and twenty three with perfect fidelity. But I'm betting > >> >> that this isn't what was originally intended by the IR idea. > >> >> > >> >> Pat > >> >> > >> >> > >> >-- > >> ><mikael@nilsson.name> > >> > > >> >Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose > >> > >> > >> -- > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home > >> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > >> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > >> FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell > >> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > >> > >> > >> > >-- > ><mikael@nilsson.name> > > > >Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose > > -- <mikael@nilsson.name> Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:27:04 UTC