- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:52:42 +0000
- To: Chairs@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1157597562.16221.92.camel@jebediah>
Dear Chairs, TAG After announcing a proposal for short namespaces on www-tag [1] and sending the Chairs notice of the proposal [2], and receiving positive feedback on www-tag and from the Director, I have updated the "URIs for W3C Namespaces" [3] to include this text: <new> Director approval of a namespace URI is REQUIRED when the URI has the form http://www.w3.org/ns/ssss, where: * ssss is a short string not causing confusion, alarm, or embarrassment. For instance, the short string should not cause confusion when used in both http://www.w3.org/TR/ and http://www.w3.org/ns/ URIs. </new> As before, a trailing "/" MAY be used and does not require Director approval. See below for an attempt to build a FAQ. As we learn more, I expect to document good practice in [3]. Thank you, - Ian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Jul/0022 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2006JulSep/0015 [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri ------------ Draft FAQ ------------ Here is an attempt to answer some questions based on very limited experience; thanks to MaxF and DanC for engaging in discussion that inspired this FAQ. Q1. Love the new short namespace URIs! Can I mint one in my spec?? A1. Yes. Please note that Director approval is required. Q2. What should we do with the existing namespace URI in our spec? A2. Please maintain it, per Webarch 3.5.1: A URI owner SHOULD provide representations of the identified resource consistently and predictably. http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#def-URI-persistence Q3. Does that mean I should not request a second namespace URI for the same namespace? A3. Per Webarch 2.3.1, you SHOULD NOT associate arbitrarily different URIs with the same resource. http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#avoid-uri-aliases Q4. If we do end up with two namespace URIs for the same namespace, how should the namespace documents relate? A4. I don't really know. One suggestion was that at a minimum, all implicated namespace documents link to the others. -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2006 02:52:59 UTC