- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:26:32 +0900
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Dear TAG, Looking at TAG finding "On Linking Alternative Representations To Enable Discovery And Publishing" http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/alternatives-discovery-20061101.html I see a number of excellent ideas, with which I agree. - The notion that every representation of a resource should have a URI is crucial - The idea that negotiation can be used to access a variety of representations through a generic URI is often overlooked - The suggestion to have all representation-specific URIs available and linked to from the Web is excellent I think, however, that the document could be improved by giving actual and practical examples in HTTP. In particular: - please add a mention of Content-Location: (from rfc2616). This header is precisely made to identify the specific URI of the representation, even if the resource is accessed through a generic, negotiated URI. The finding should definitely mention this header. - please add a mention of Alternates: (from rfc2295, rfc4229, etc.) The finding mentions the Vary: header. Good. But Vary does not give the actual URIs of alternate representations, which is the point here. Alternates: is what you want in this context. Thanks, -- olivier
Received on Friday, 10 November 2006 07:26:43 UTC