- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:55:20 -0500
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Jacek Kopecky writes:
> Is there a summary of the points against using such section
> URIs to indicate concepts?
I think so. Basically, it becomes very hard to make an RDF statement
about the section without it ambiguously appearing to be a statement about
the concept, and vice versa.
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
01/19/06 12:39 PM
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
cc: www-tag@w3.org
Subject: Re: A URI for the class of SOAP MEPs
Hi Noah, TAG,
the suggestion to use a section URI for the concept defined in the
section was first (to my knowledge) discussed in WS-Description WG,
as those WG members who aren't SemWeb-fluent didn't see the point of
inventing new URIs for the purpose of the RDF mapping.
I haven't seen the RDDL discussion on the TAG list, I'll try to have a
look. I guess the problems of resource vs. its description, and "what
are really resources identified with URIs with fragment IDs in them?"
are pretty subtle.
Is there a summary of the points against using such section URIs to
indicate concepts?
Best regards,
Jacek
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 18:06 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> On distApp Jacek Kopecky raised a question [1] as to whether it would be
> appropriate to use the URI of a section in the SOAP Recommendation to
> identify the class of all possible SOAP Message exchange patterns. I
have
> suggested that a separate URI would be more appropriate [2]. I think
the
> SOAP question is the direct analog of the RDDL natures discussion we've
> been having here.
>
> Noah
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jan/0103.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jan/0110.html
>
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 17:56:05 UTC