W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2006

Re: A URI for the class of SOAP MEPs

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:39:24 +0100
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1137692364.3911.60.camel@localhost>

Hi Noah, TAG,

the suggestion to use a section URI for the concept defined in the
section was first (to my knowledge) discussed in WS-Description WG, 
as those WG members who aren't SemWeb-fluent didn't see the point of
inventing new URIs for the purpose of the RDF mapping.

I haven't seen the RDDL discussion on the TAG list, I'll try to have a
look. I guess the problems of resource vs. its description, and "what
are really resources identified with URIs with fragment IDs in them?"
are pretty subtle.

Is there a summary of the points against using such section URIs to
indicate concepts?

Best regards,

Jacek

On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 18:06 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> On distApp Jacek Kopecky raised a question [1] as to whether it would be 
> appropriate to use the URI of a section in the SOAP Recommendation to 
> identify the class of all possible SOAP Message exchange patterns.  I have 
> suggested that a separate URI would be more appropriate [2].  I think the 
> SOAP question is the direct analog of the RDDL natures discussion we've 
> been having here.
> 
> Noah
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jan/0103.html 
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jan/0110.html
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn 
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 17:39:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:10 UTC